Domestic Violence

Arizona Family Law

Domestic Violence & Custody In Arizona

Arizona changed the rules in June 2026. Abuse is no longer only about whether someone was hit, and a finding of abuse now shapes who gets legal decision-making and parenting time. Whether you are trying to protect your children or you have been accused, what happens at your first hearing matters more than it used to.

A parent steadying a child learning to ride a bike at sunset

Abuse is not just hitting anymore. And it can decide custody.

What Changed

The Alec & Lydia Act

In June 2026 Arizona rewrote the statute that governs how family courts handle domestic violence in custody cases, A.R.S. section 25-403.03. The law is called the Alec and Lydia Act. It was signed on June 22, 2026 and took effect immediately.

It is named for Alec and Lydia, two young children killed by their father during court-ordered parenting time in 2024, after their mother had raised concerns about their safety with the court.

The change is not cosmetic. The old statute asked whether there had been significant domestic violence. The new one asks whether a parent committed domestic violence at all, defines that term far more broadly, and tells the court what it must do once it finds that the answer is yes.

The New Definition

What Counts As Abuse Now

Domestic violence now means either a criminal domestic violence offense under A.R.S. section 13-3601, or coercive control. Coercive control is a pattern of violent, threatening, coercive or emotionally abusive conduct by one parent against the other. The statute lists fifteen kinds of it.

Acting in defense of yourself or of another person is expressly not domestic violence under this law.

Money & Resources

  • Monitoring or controlling financial activity
  • Restricting economic resources
  • Cutting off access to services

Isolation & Movement

  • Isolation from friends and family
  • Confinement, or words and actions that restrict your freedom of movement
  • Restricting lawful activity

Surveillance & Stalking

  • Using surveillance or tracking technology
  • Stalking or harassment

Threats

  • Threatening to kill or injure a person, including themselves, or a household pet
  • Handling or displaying a firearm or weapon in a way that implies a threat
  • Threatening to publish sensitive or explicit material
  • Threatening to make reports to law enforcement
  • Jeopardizing the other parent’s immigration status

Using The System

  • Threatening, filing or using court cases to force you to defend false or frivolous claims
  • Using litigation to restrict your lawful or constitutionally protected activity

Degradation & Property

  • Demeaning, degrading or humiliating words or actions
  • Damaging property you own or lawfully possess
  • Forcing you to commit a crime against your stated wishes
  • Sexual or other physical assault
Why A Finding Matters

What Happens Once A Court Finds Abuse

If the court finds that a parent committed domestic violence, a mandatory rebuttable presumption applies. Giving that parent legal decision-making or parenting time is presumed to be contrary to the child’s best interests.

The presumption can be overcome, but the burden sits on the parent who committed the abuse, and how heavy that burden is depends on what they are asking for.

Sole Or Joint Legal Decision-Making

Authority over school, medical care and religion

Clear and convincing evidence

Unsupervised Parenting Time

Time alone with the child

Clear and convincing evidence

Supervised Parenting Time

Time with a supervisor present

Preponderance of the evidence

Two Different Standards, And People Mix Them Up

Proving that the abuse happened takes a preponderance of the evidence, which means more likely than not.

Getting out from under the presumption, for decision-making or unsupervised time, takes clear and convincing evidence, which is a considerably higher bar. That gap is the practical center of this law.

An attorney reviewing a written order across a desk

The court has to put its domestic violence findings in writing before it enters an order on decision-making or parenting time.

Closed Doors

What A Court Can No Longer Do

The statute takes three familiar arguments off the table.

Demand That It Was Bad Enough

A court cannot require a victim to prove the abuse was severe or frequent enough to justify restricting the other parent.

Call It Mutual

A court cannot describe the abuse as mutual, or apply the presumption to both parents, unless both lacked justification to a similar degree and caused similar injury. Otherwise it applies to the parent whose conduct and motivation were more serious.

Discount It Because The Kids Missed It

The child’s absence from the scene, the child’s unawareness that it happened, and the child’s wish for more contact with the abusive parent are all irrelevant to the presumption.

Evidence

Proving It, & What To Keep

A domestic violence claim is established by a preponderance of the evidence. The statute says plainly that corroboration from exhibits or from another person’s testimony is not required. Your own account can carry a claim.

That said, cases are still won on detail. The court is directed to consider a range of material, and the more of it you have, the less the case turns on memory.

  • Findings about abuse already made by another court
  • Police reports and evidence collected by law enforcement
  • Department of Child Safety records
  • Medical and behavioral health records
  • Domestic violence shelter records
  • School records
  • Witness testimony
  • Texts, emails and voicemails, kept with their dates
A woman reading messages on her phone at home

Save the messages. Note the dates. Coercive control is proved by pattern, not by one moment.

A Practical Note

Write things down as they happen, with dates. A contemporaneous note made the week of an incident is worth more than a detailed recollection assembled a year later, and coercive control is proven by pattern rather than by any single event.

The Other Side

If You Have Been Accused

The same law that helps a parent prove abuse raises the stakes for a parent accused of it. An allegation now reaches conduct that would not have been called abuse before, corroboration is not required, and a finding brings a presumption that is difficult to rebut.

Being accused is not the same as a finding. The court still has to decide whether the conduct happened and whether it meets the definition, and defense of yourself or of another person is not domestic violence under this statute. If you were the one protecting yourself, that is a legal argument, not an excuse.

Where a finding is entered, the statute directs the court to look at the severity and frequency of the conduct, whether the parent denied, deflected or minimized it, whether the child imitated the behavior, whether a qualifying treatment program was completed, and whether the parent understands the harm caused. A court can also impose conditions such as supervised exchanges, supervision costs, limits on overnights, treatment programs, abstention from alcohol or drugs, or a bond.

The first hearing is where most of this gets decided. Going in without advice is the most expensive choice available.

Two Desert Legal Group attorneys working through a case file in the firm\u2019s Phoenix office

Whichever side you are on, the work starts before the first hearing.

Timing

Whether It Applies To Your Case

The Act took effect immediately on June 22, 2026 as an emergency measure, so it is already in force.

The statute itself does not contain a clause spelling out which cases it reaches. The bill’s sponsor has stated publicly that it applies in active legal decision-making and parenting time matters regardless of when the case was originally filed, including temporary orders and requests to modify existing orders, and that it does not by itself change a final order or reopen a closed case.

As a practical matter, a court decides using the law in effect when it enters its order. If your matter is in front of a judge now, this statute is the one in the room. If you are considering a modification, the law also directs courts to make written findings about abuse before entering orders, which is worth knowing before you file.

Common Questions

Domestic Violence & Custody FAQs

Does the abuse have to be physical?+

No. A criminal domestic violence offense still counts, but so does coercive control, which covers financial control, isolation, surveillance, threats, harassment and other conduct listed in the statute. A pattern with no physical violence in it at all can meet the definition.

Do I need a police report or a witness?+

No. The statute states that corroboration from exhibits or from another person’s testimony is not required. Records and witnesses help, but their absence is not a bar.

We both said things. Does that cancel it out?+

It did under the old law, and that is one of the biggest changes. A court can only treat abuse as mutual if both parents lacked justification to a similar degree and inflicted similar injury.

Otherwise the presumption applies to the parent whose conduct and motivation were more serious.

My children never saw anything. Does that matter?+

Not to the presumption. The statute directs the court to disregard the child’s absence from the scene and the child’s unawareness that abuse occurred.

Can a parent who committed abuse still see the children?+

Yes, but not automatically. Supervised parenting time requires that parent to overcome the presumption by a preponderance of the evidence. Unsupervised time and legal decision-making require clear and convincing evidence.

Courts can also attach conditions, including supervised exchanges, no overnights, treatment programs, substance testing or a bond.

Is a protective order the same thing?+

No. An order of protection is a separate process with its own filing and hearing, and this Act does not change how those orders are obtained or enforced.

The two do interact. A finding in one case can matter in the other, and misusing protective order litigation to harass the other parent is itself listed as coercive control.

What if I have been falsely accused?+

An accusation is not a finding. The court still decides whether the conduct occurred and whether it meets the statutory definition, and acting in defense of yourself or another person is excluded from that definition. Get advice before the first hearing rather than after it.

My case was filed before June 2026. Does this apply?+

The Act has been in effect since June 22, 2026. The bill’s sponsor has said it applies in active decision-making and parenting time matters no matter when the case was filed, and that it does not reopen closed cases or by itself change a final order.

Because the statute does not spell this out and no Arizona appellate court has ruled on it yet, this is worth asking an attorney about for your specific case.

Talk To Someone

Know Where You Stand Before Your Next Hearing

Whether you are trying to protect your children or defend against an allegation, this law rewards preparation and punishes improvisation. We will tell you honestly what your position looks like and what to do next.

If you are in immediate danger, call 911. The National Domestic Violence Hotline is 1-800-799-7233.

Contact our

Family Law Experts

Desert Legal Group provides dedicated, client-focused legal representation in family law, criminal defense, and personal injury. Low caseloads mean your attorney has time to invest in your case.